What Agreement Gave Religious Freedom To The Lutherans
In France, the government governs religious activities in all its dimensions – worship, observance, practice and teaching – to protect the rights of others, public order, health and morality. This regulatory oversight applies not only to religious organizations, but to any type of organized group in France. As far as the regulation of religious activities is concerned, the state does not make religious interpretations. It does not define religion, because the state is incompetent in matters of faith. But the state also makes no exceptions to general laws and regulations for religious reasons. U.S. courts can be more flexible when there is a strong religious motivation at stake – permission to use a hallucinogenic substance in Indian rituals, for example – a policy that has been controversial in the United States over the past decade. This difference in emphasis has implications for the behaviour of external relations. The French tend to sympathize with the author Salman Rushdie, perceived as the “Voltaire of Islam” who thinks freely. Americans agree, but they also emphasize the right of every Muslim to be baptized as a Christian. This may lead to a different approach to foreign policy implementation. The civil war in Sudan, for example, tends to be debated in the American public debate as a war of religion.
As a result, the efforts of american mediation for peace have tended to be more intense and have focused more on the issue of religion. On the other hand, French politics tends to regard this conflict as a traditional secular power rivalry. Both of these cases are legitimate. But both also risk ignoring the real political and social developments – democratization and women`s rights, for example – that are taking place in Muslim states today. In this sense, both French and American opinion tend to miss out on the majority of Muslims who follow both Islam and are good citizens. After the days of the Nuremberg Reich had not reached the goal of Luther`s arrest in 1526, it was decided in speyer`s First Reichstag that until a general council could meet and resolve the theological issues raised by Martin Luther, Worms` edict would not be imposed and that each leader could decide whether Lutheran teachings and worships were allowed on his territories. In 1529, during the Second Reichstag of Speyer, the decision of the former Reichstag of Speyer was overturned, despite strong protests from Lutheran princes, free cities and some forced territories. These states quickly became Protestants. First, this Protestant term was used politically for states that opposed Worms` edict.
Categorised as: 未分类