Collateral Agreement Exception
Finally, evidence from Parol can be used to demonstrate that a party has been fraudulently induced to conclude an agreement A theory holds that it is possible to accredit as a guarantee contract for a third party beneficiary, given that the accreditors are motivated by the need of the buyer and that, in application of Jean Domat`s theory, the cause of a credit is: that a bank has a loan in favor of a seller in order to exempt the buyer from his obligation to pay directly to the seller as legal tender. There are indeed three different entities that participate in the accrediting transaction: the seller, the buyer and the banker. Therefore, a credit corresponds theoretically to a guarantee contract accepted by the conduct, or, in other words, to an implied contract.  In the English case of Barry vs. Davies, it was found that an auctioneer and a buyer had entered into a warranty agreement.  It was decided that, even if the main order does not concern the auction, the advantages granted to the auction for the increase in the price of the offer constitute a good consideration.  The Claimants signed the contract without reading it and were late in reading it. In the dispute, the applicants claimed that the credit association had acted fraudulently to induce them to restructure the debt contract. The complainants wanted to provide external evidence that the credit union`s vice-president met with them two weeks before the contract was signed and promised them that the association would extend the loan by two years, not three months. These alleged promises directly contradicted the written contract, which provides for an indulgence of only three months and not two years.  The second case in which evidence of parol is admissible is evidence of ancillary agreements. most warranty contracts are unilateral, which means that only one party makes a promise (for example. B the supply of a product or service) in exchange for funds.
The approval of the initial contract is in return for the ancillary contract. An ancillary contract is a contract in which the parties to a contract enter into another contract or promise to enter into another contract. The two treaties are therefore linked and can be applied, although they do not constitute a constructive element of the original treaty.  In JJ Savage and Sons Pty Ltd v. Blakney, a mere expression of opinion was found to be insufficient to be kept as a promise. In Crown Melbourne Limited v Cosmopolitan Hotel (Vic) Pty Ltd, a statement by an owner to tenants, when negotiating a lease agreement that they would be “taken over at the extension period”, would not require the lessor to offer another five-year lease.  For example, an employment contract may be considered integrated if it contains all the contractual provisions normally expected of an employment contract, such as duration of employment, staff salary, time off, health insurance coverage and other benefits. The circumstances and conditions must indicate that the letter is intended as a concluded agreement. Contracts may also indicate, on their own terms, that they are intended to be final and complete agreements. For example, a full agreement may contain a clause that says something to the effect: “This written agreement contains the final and complete agreement of the parties. The parties do not intend to be subject to any additional terms and conditions not set out in this letter. Such a provision virtually guarantees that it is an integrated agreement.
The rule applies to evidence that relates to a contract but is not included in the text of the contract. External evidence may be other written agreements, written commitments, oral agreements and interviews prior to the conclusion of the written contract. Sometimes a term is ambiguous and needs external evidence to clarify them.
Categorised as: 未分类