Constitutional rights defender Faizan Mustafa characterized the 1947 agreement (known as the membership instrument) that the Maharajah of Kashmir decided to join India as one between two sovereign states – in other words, it has the character of an international treaty. He says the repeal of Section 370 may allow the Indian government to interpret Kashmir as a sovereign state before the agreement. Under the Constitution, section 370 could only be amended with the agreement of the “state government.” But for more than a year, there has been little more state government in Jammu and Kashmir. JK is an integral part of India with an agreement, that is to say with the President of India. Later, 370 were introduced on temporary bases. Many illegal measures were taken by Irrleventures Elelements on his strength, therefore immediately, on the orders of the president, it should be withdrawn for greater integrity of JK India and the prosperity of the people. All unwanted items must be removed from the state by force. No expectation is intended, but a sought-after inconsistency. Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan has been no different from his predecessors in Kashmir policy, as his government uses both bilateral discussions and raises the issue at the international level.
However, India`s initiative to lift the special status of the Kashmir Valley last August, which observers expect to bring about demographic changes in the valley, was significant. It was the first time India had taken unilateral action in defiance of previous agreements, leading to the failure of bilateral talks. 370. All the provisions of this Constitution, amended from time to time, without amendments or exceptions, apply to the State of Jammu and Kashmir, without prejudice to a violation of Article 152 or Article 308 or another article of that Constitution or other provision of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, or a law, document, judgment, regulation, regulation, rule, regulation, regulation, notification, custom or use of legal force on the territory of India or any other instrument , a section 363 contract or agreement or any other means. The historic Simla Agreement, signed by Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and Pakistani President Zulfikar Ali Bhutto in July 1972, established that the issue should be resolved bilaterally. This principle has been followed by various successive agreements between Indian and Pakistani leaders. The two sides were closest to an agreement when the Lahore Declaration in February 1999, under Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and his Pakistani counterpart Nawaz Sharif. However, the results were alerted after the conflict that broke out in Kargil in May 1999. The two sides met several times after the war, but failed to reach consensus each time. In addition, militancy and the explosion of violence have made the problem even more complex. I heard it too, and Nehru is accused of all evils.
If Sardar disagreed, he should have resigned. As far as I know, the Constitution is a living document, not a frozen or immutable text. It can always be modified by the agreement of the majority of states. Why isn`t it done?? Is it because India is on the attacking ground with regard to Kashmir? If so, give it away and get off Kashmir. Staying in limbo is like living with a lazy leg that can be treated properly by amputation. So, India, what does it do? Could you admit what you`re doing with your peace of mind? A great nation and a great people do not live in deesimulation. What is your long-term plan? If we heard it, we would lose the pride of India.
Categorised as: 未分类